Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned notice issued under section 148 and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers (AOs) for fresh consideration. The AOs are directed to evaluate each show-cause notice individually, apply governing SC and HC precedents, and determine jurisdictional authority, sanction requirements and the applicability of section 153C procedures where relevant. AOs must also examine and decide the question of surviving limitation period for reassessment for each noticee, and record reasoned, speaking orders addressing the impact of those precedents on the reassessment notices. The writ petitions are disposed subject to the aforesaid directions; further proceedings shall conform to the orders remanding the matters to the AOs.
The HC set aside the impugned notice issued under section 148 and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers (AOs) for fresh consideration. The AOs are directed to evaluate each show-cause notice individually, apply governing SC and HC precedents, and determine jurisdictional authority, sanction requirements and the applicability of section 153C procedures where relevant. AOs must also examine and decide the question of surviving limitation period for reassessment for each noticee, and record reasoned, speaking orders addressing the impact of those precedents on the reassessment notices. The writ petitions are disposed subject to the aforesaid directions; further proceedings shall conform to the orders remanding the matters to the AOs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.