Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
The HC set aside the impugned notice issued under section 148 and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers (AOs) for fresh consideration. The AOs are directed to evaluate each show-cause notice individually, apply governing SC and HC precedents, and determine jurisdictional authority, sanction requirements and the applicability of section 153C procedures where relevant. AOs must also examine and decide the question of surviving limitation period for reassessment for each noticee, and record reasoned, speaking orders addressing the impact of those precedents on the reassessment notices. The writ petitions are disposed subject to the aforesaid directions; further proceedings shall conform to the orders remanding the matters to the AOs.
The HC set aside the impugned notice issued under section 148 and remanded the matters to the respective Assessing Officers (AOs) for fresh consideration. The AOs are directed to evaluate each show-cause notice individually, apply governing SC and HC precedents, and determine jurisdictional authority, sanction requirements and the applicability of section 153C procedures where relevant. AOs must also examine and decide the question of surviving limitation period for reassessment for each noticee, and record reasoned, speaking orders addressing the impact of those precedents on the reassessment notices. The writ petitions are disposed subject to the aforesaid directions; further proceedings shall conform to the orders remanding the matters to the AOs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
