Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 26 March 2025 passed by the respondent under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a delay of 133 days in electronically filing Form No.10B for AY 2019-20. The court found the lapse was inadvertent, not deliberate or mala fide, attributable to the petitioner's auditor, and the petitioner-a charitable trust running educational institutions-had otherwise complied with statutory requirements and obtained the audit report timely. Refusal to condone would have caused grave injustice and financial hardship. Consequently, the denial of exemption under s.11 premised solely on the technical non-filing was effectively set aside and relief granted.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 26 March 2025 passed by the respondent under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a delay of 133 days in electronically filing Form No.10B for AY 2019-20. The court found the lapse was inadvertent, not deliberate or mala fide, attributable to the petitioner's auditor, and the petitioner-a charitable trust running educational institutions-had otherwise complied with statutory requirements and obtained the audit report timely. Refusal to condone would have caused grave injustice and financial hardship. Consequently, the denial of exemption under s.11 premised solely on the technical non-filing was effectively set aside and relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
