Reclassification, differential duty, confiscation and penalties quashed where department lacked chemical evidence and improperly reopened past clearan...
Anticipatory bail refused where accused allegedly assaulted and threatened a public servant; custodial interrogation deemed necessary for investigatio...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 26 March 2025 passed by the respondent under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a delay of 133 days in electronically filing Form No.10B for AY 2019-20. The court found the lapse was inadvertent, not deliberate or mala fide, attributable to the petitioner's auditor, and the petitioner-a charitable trust running educational institutions-had otherwise complied with statutory requirements and obtained the audit report timely. Refusal to condone would have caused grave injustice and financial hardship. Consequently, the denial of exemption under s.11 premised solely on the technical non-filing was effectively set aside and relief granted.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 26 March 2025 passed by the respondent under s.119(2)(b) and condoned a delay of 133 days in electronically filing Form No.10B for AY 2019-20. The court found the lapse was inadvertent, not deliberate or mala fide, attributable to the petitioner's auditor, and the petitioner-a charitable trust running educational institutions-had otherwise complied with statutory requirements and obtained the audit report timely. Refusal to condone would have caused grave injustice and financial hardship. Consequently, the denial of exemption under s.11 premised solely on the technical non-filing was effectively set aside and relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
