Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9341 to 9360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld that the taxpayer, an Irish tax resident acting as principal distributor and licensor for software and hardware, did not constitute a permanent establishment (PE) in India through its non-exclusive local distributor, nor qualify as a dependent-agent PE. The Tribunal found the facts identical to the taxpayer's prior ruling and determined the assessing officer's attribution of Indian business connection and taxable profit lacked persuasive contrary evidence from the tax authority. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the income additions made by the assessing officer related to software and hardware sales, exports, reimbursements and royalties, and allowed the appeal in favour of the taxpayer.
The ITAT upheld that the taxpayer, an Irish tax resident acting as principal distributor and licensor for software and hardware, did not constitute a permanent establishment (PE) in India through its non-exclusive local distributor, nor qualify as a dependent-agent PE. The Tribunal found the facts identical to the taxpayer's prior ruling and determined the assessing officer's attribution of Indian business connection and taxable profit lacked persuasive contrary evidence from the tax authority. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the income additions made by the assessing officer related to software and hardware sales, exports, reimbursements and royalties, and allowed the appeal in favour of the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.