Appeal allowed: conversion treated as manufacture, entitlement under Notification No.56/2002-CE and CENVAT credits reinstated, including returned and ...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10141 to 10160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that foreign remittances characterized as "management/processing fees" are not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) and therefore the addition treating them as FTS is deleted; the appeal ground challenging taxability is allowed following a co-ordinate bench precedent in the assessee's own case. With respect to levy of fee under s.234F, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the assessee's contention that the return was filed in response to an s.148 notice and, if established, to take action in accordance with law regarding applicability of s.234F.
ITAT held that foreign remittances characterized as "management/processing fees" are not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) and therefore the addition treating them as FTS is deleted; the appeal ground challenging taxability is allowed following a co-ordinate bench precedent in the assessee's own case. With respect to levy of fee under s.234F, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the assessee's contention that the return was filed in response to an s.148 notice and, if established, to take action in accordance with law regarding applicability of s.234F.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
