Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that foreign remittances characterized as "management/processing fees" are not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) and therefore the addition treating them as FTS is deleted; the appeal ground challenging taxability is allowed following a co-ordinate bench precedent in the assessee's own case. With respect to levy of fee under s.234F, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the assessee's contention that the return was filed in response to an s.148 notice and, if established, to take action in accordance with law regarding applicability of s.234F.
ITAT held that foreign remittances characterized as "management/processing fees" are not taxable as fees for technical services (FTS) and therefore the addition treating them as FTS is deleted; the appeal ground challenging taxability is allowed following a co-ordinate bench precedent in the assessee's own case. With respect to levy of fee under s.234F, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the assessee's contention that the return was filed in response to an s.148 notice and, if established, to take action in accordance with law regarding applicability of s.234F.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
