Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
The ITAT upheld the co-ordinate bench decision and allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that amounts characterized as GIT/Infrastructure charges did not constitute fees for included services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Canada DTAA nor did they constitute "royalty" under Article 12(3). The Tribunal found that the payments by Indian group entities were consideration for mere use of third-party software (a copyrighted article without transfer of copyright or grant for commercial exploitation) and therefore fell outside the treaty definitions of FIS and royalty. Consequently, the impugned assessment treating the receipts as FIS/royalty was reversed.
The ITAT upheld the co-ordinate bench decision and allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that amounts characterized as GIT/Infrastructure charges did not constitute fees for included services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Canada DTAA nor did they constitute "royalty" under Article 12(3). The Tribunal found that the payments by Indian group entities were consideration for mere use of third-party software (a copyrighted article without transfer of copyright or grant for commercial exploitation) and therefore fell outside the treaty definitions of FIS and royalty. Consequently, the impugned assessment treating the receipts as FIS/royalty was reversed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
