Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessment framed u/s 143(3) by the ITO, Ward-3(4), Gurgaon is void for want of the mandatory notice u/s 143(2). The Tribunal found that the original 143(2) notice was issued by a non-jurisdictional ITO and, following PAN-based jurisdictional transfer, the jurisdictional ITO did not issue a fresh 143(2) notice before passing the 143(3) order which made additions. Reliance on applicable precedents led the ITAT to conclude the assessment cannot be sustained; consequently the impugned assessment order and the CIT(A)'s confirmation were set aside and the assessee's additional grounds were allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessment framed u/s 143(3) by the ITO, Ward-3(4), Gurgaon is void for want of the mandatory notice u/s 143(2). The Tribunal found that the original 143(2) notice was issued by a non-jurisdictional ITO and, following PAN-based jurisdictional transfer, the jurisdictional ITO did not issue a fresh 143(2) notice before passing the 143(3) order which made additions. Reliance on applicable precedents led the ITAT to conclude the assessment cannot be sustained; consequently the impugned assessment order and the CIT(A)'s confirmation were set aside and the assessee's additional grounds were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
