Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the confirmed service-tax demands, holding that the appellant, a government-owned electricity distribution licensee, furnishes transmission and distribution services exempt under the negative list (s.66D(k)) and that ancillary activities constitute bundled services within the exemption. The Tribunal concluded that prior notifications and the statutory scheme preclude levy of service tax on direct or ancillary transmission/distribution services for the period in dispute. Further, demands raised under the extended period were quashed as time-barred: the Revenue failed to prove suppression or concealment and the appellant's bona fide accounting and reliance on prevailing judicial/regulatory position negatived invocation of extended limitation. Appeal allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the confirmed service-tax demands, holding that the appellant, a government-owned electricity distribution licensee, furnishes transmission and distribution services exempt under the negative list (s.66D(k)) and that ancillary activities constitute bundled services within the exemption. The Tribunal concluded that prior notifications and the statutory scheme preclude levy of service tax on direct or ancillary transmission/distribution services for the period in dispute. Further, demands raised under the extended period were quashed as time-barred: the Revenue failed to prove suppression or concealment and the appellant's bona fide accounting and reliance on prevailing judicial/regulatory position negatived invocation of extended limitation. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
