Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's award of delayed interest under Section 18(1)(a) of the RERA Act, finding no dispute as to the contractual completion date and the admitted offer of possession, rendering the interest calculation a mechanical entitlement not requiring adjudication. The HC confirmed the Tribunal's concurrent exercise of appellate and revisional powers under Section 44(6) and validated appropriation of deposits made under Section 43(5) toward adjudicated dues, permitting refund only to the extent amounts exceed interest payable upon appropriate application. All appeals by the Promoter were dismissed; the Allottee's appeal was also dismissed for failure to raise compensatory claims before the Tribunal.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's award of delayed interest under Section 18(1)(a) of the RERA Act, finding no dispute as to the contractual completion date and the admitted offer of possession, rendering the interest calculation a mechanical entitlement not requiring adjudication. The HC confirmed the Tribunal's concurrent exercise of appellate and revisional powers under Section 44(6) and validated appropriation of deposits made under Section 43(5) toward adjudicated dues, permitting refund only to the extent amounts exceed interest payable upon appropriate application. All appeals by the Promoter were dismissed; the Allottee's appeal was also dismissed for failure to raise compensatory claims before the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.