Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication. The court found that the petitioner did not receive statutory notices and had been deprived of an opportunity to file replies/documents, and despite the revenue's contention that limitation was extended by executive notifications, the HC directed that the petitioner be afforded one further opportunity to be heard. The 2nd respondent is ordered to reconsider the matter afresh and pass a fresh adjudication order in accordance with law to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders. Petition disposed of by remand with directions for rehearing.
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication. The court found that the petitioner did not receive statutory notices and had been deprived of an opportunity to file replies/documents, and despite the revenue's contention that limitation was extended by executive notifications, the HC directed that the petitioner be afforded one further opportunity to be heard. The 2nd respondent is ordered to reconsider the matter afresh and pass a fresh adjudication order in accordance with law to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders. Petition disposed of by remand with directions for rehearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.