Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication. The court found that the petitioner did not receive statutory notices and had been deprived of an opportunity to file replies/documents, and despite the revenue's contention that limitation was extended by executive notifications, the HC directed that the petitioner be afforded one further opportunity to be heard. The 2nd respondent is ordered to reconsider the matter afresh and pass a fresh adjudication order in accordance with law to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders. Petition disposed of by remand with directions for rehearing.
The HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent for fresh adjudication. The court found that the petitioner did not receive statutory notices and had been deprived of an opportunity to file replies/documents, and despite the revenue's contention that limitation was extended by executive notifications, the HC directed that the petitioner be afforded one further opportunity to be heard. The 2nd respondent is ordered to reconsider the matter afresh and pass a fresh adjudication order in accordance with law to avoid multiplicity and conflicting orders. Petition disposed of by remand with directions for rehearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
