Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the validity of the impugned show-cause notice issued to the transferor company, holding that the notice is not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction; factual and jurisdictional questions relating to the demerger and retrospective operation of the 2018 Notification require examination and cannot be summarily struck down. The Respondents are entitled to consider the demerger particulars and the applicability of the 2018 Notification when adjudicating the SCN, and the Petitioners are relegated to file a detailed response with full particulars and exhaust statutory remedies. The court found no exceptional circumstance to preclude adjudication or to quash the SCN at the threshold.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the validity of the impugned show-cause notice issued to the transferor company, holding that the notice is not shown to be wholly without jurisdiction; factual and jurisdictional questions relating to the demerger and retrospective operation of the 2018 Notification require examination and cannot be summarily struck down. The Respondents are entitled to consider the demerger particulars and the applicability of the 2018 Notification when adjudicating the SCN, and the Petitioners are relegated to file a detailed response with full particulars and exhaust statutory remedies. The court found no exceptional circumstance to preclude adjudication or to quash the SCN at the threshold.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
