Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that notices and orders issued outside the faceless assessment mechanism under Section 144(b) read with Section 151A and the E-Assessment Scheme, 2022 are void for jurisdictional infirmity. Applying precedent from superior fora, the Court concluded the JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue the impugned communications where the Scheme and statutory mandate required issuance through the faceless/FAO process; consequently the reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant thereto are quashed. Relief granted to the assessee: all impugned notices and consequential orders issued by the JAO or otherwise outside the prescribed faceless mechanism are declared bad in law and set aside.
The HC held that notices and orders issued outside the faceless assessment mechanism under Section 144(b) read with Section 151A and the E-Assessment Scheme, 2022 are void for jurisdictional infirmity. Applying precedent from superior fora, the Court concluded the JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue the impugned communications where the Scheme and statutory mandate required issuance through the faceless/FAO process; consequently the reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant thereto are quashed. Relief granted to the assessee: all impugned notices and consequential orders issued by the JAO or otherwise outside the prescribed faceless mechanism are declared bad in law and set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
