Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that notices and orders issued outside the faceless assessment mechanism under Section 144(b) read with Section 151A and the E-Assessment Scheme, 2022 are void for jurisdictional infirmity. Applying precedent from superior fora, the Court concluded the JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue the impugned communications where the Scheme and statutory mandate required issuance through the faceless/FAO process; consequently the reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant thereto are quashed. Relief granted to the assessee: all impugned notices and consequential orders issued by the JAO or otherwise outside the prescribed faceless mechanism are declared bad in law and set aside.
The HC held that notices and orders issued outside the faceless assessment mechanism under Section 144(b) read with Section 151A and the E-Assessment Scheme, 2022 are void for jurisdictional infirmity. Applying precedent from superior fora, the Court concluded the JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue the impugned communications where the Scheme and statutory mandate required issuance through the faceless/FAO process; consequently the reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant thereto are quashed. Relief granted to the assessee: all impugned notices and consequential orders issued by the JAO or otherwise outside the prescribed faceless mechanism are declared bad in law and set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.