Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC directed Respondent No.1 to give effect to the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 19 February 2024 and to grant the Petitioner a refund of taxes paid, together with interest under section 244A of the I.T. Act. The court found the assessment demand extinguished by deletion of additions on appeal and held that pending inquiries or verifications directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot justify withholding the refund. The HC also noted that reassessment notices for the relevant years have been quashed, there is presently no subsisting demand, and consequently Respondent No.1 must immediately pass consequential orders and release the refund with statutory interest.
The HC directed Respondent No.1 to give effect to the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 19 February 2024 and to grant the Petitioner a refund of taxes paid, together with interest under section 244A of the I.T. Act. The court found the assessment demand extinguished by deletion of additions on appeal and held that pending inquiries or verifications directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot justify withholding the refund. The HC also noted that reassessment notices for the relevant years have been quashed, there is presently no subsisting demand, and consequently Respondent No.1 must immediately pass consequential orders and release the refund with statutory interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.