Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC directed Respondent No.1 to give effect to the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 19 February 2024 and to grant the Petitioner a refund of taxes paid, together with interest under section 244A of the I.T. Act. The court found the assessment demand extinguished by deletion of additions on appeal and held that pending inquiries or verifications directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot justify withholding the refund. The HC also noted that reassessment notices for the relevant years have been quashed, there is presently no subsisting demand, and consequently Respondent No.1 must immediately pass consequential orders and release the refund with statutory interest.
The HC directed Respondent No.1 to give effect to the Commissioner (Appeals) order dated 19 February 2024 and to grant the Petitioner a refund of taxes paid, together with interest under section 244A of the I.T. Act. The court found the assessment demand extinguished by deletion of additions on appeal and held that pending inquiries or verifications directed by the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot justify withholding the refund. The HC also noted that reassessment notices for the relevant years have been quashed, there is presently no subsisting demand, and consequently Respondent No.1 must immediately pass consequential orders and release the refund with statutory interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
