Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that additions for alleged capital gains and unexplained cash under section 69A, founded solely on uncorroborated personal diary entries and retracted statements of employees/directors, lacked evidentiary foundation and were deleted. Reassessment proceedings initiated by the jurisdictional AO were declared void ab initio as jurisdiction had vested in the Faceless Assessing Officer under the notified scheme; consequently the section 148 notice was coram non judice. The assessment order was also vitiated for failure to generate/quote a valid pre-generated DIN, rendering it a nullity. The appellate enhancement sought by Revenue was held not maintainable for want of cogent material within the scope of matters before the AO/CIT(A).
ITAT held that additions for alleged capital gains and unexplained cash under section 69A, founded solely on uncorroborated personal diary entries and retracted statements of employees/directors, lacked evidentiary foundation and were deleted. Reassessment proceedings initiated by the jurisdictional AO were declared void ab initio as jurisdiction had vested in the Faceless Assessing Officer under the notified scheme; consequently the section 148 notice was coram non judice. The assessment order was also vitiated for failure to generate/quote a valid pre-generated DIN, rendering it a nullity. The appellate enhancement sought by Revenue was held not maintainable for want of cogent material within the scope of matters before the AO/CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
