Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.