Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.