Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
HC, exercising its inherent jurisdiction sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, entertained a criminal revision under s.138 NI Act notwithstanding prior dismissal of appeal and affirmed conviction. The Court held that inherent power is available only where no adequate statutory remedy exists or where special circumstances justify intervention, and may be invoked to give effect to the substantive justice embodied in a bona fide compromise. Finding a valid out-of-court Memorandum of Compromise between the parties, the HC disposed of the revision in terms of that compromise, thereby modifying the earlier outcome and concluding proceedings between the anonymized applicant and respondent pursuant to the compromise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.