Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the assessee, being a domestic company which elected taxation under section 115BAA by filing Form 10IC for FY 2019-20 and subsequent years, is taxable at the prescribed flat rate of 22% on its total income, including long-term capital gains. The Tribunal found no merit in applying the concessional 20% rate under section 112 and upheld the order of the CIT(A). Consequentially, the appeal is dismissed and the assessment stands confirmed at the 22% rate pursuant to the assessee's valid exercise of the 115BAA option.
ITAT held that the assessee, being a domestic company which elected taxation under section 115BAA by filing Form 10IC for FY 2019-20 and subsequent years, is taxable at the prescribed flat rate of 22% on its total income, including long-term capital gains. The Tribunal found no merit in applying the concessional 20% rate under section 112 and upheld the order of the CIT(A). Consequentially, the appeal is dismissed and the assessment stands confirmed at the 22% rate pursuant to the assessee's valid exercise of the 115BAA option.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.