Appeal allows marketing payments as deductible business expenses under Sec.37; director pay retained; R&D deductible from certificate date under Sec.3...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9881 to 9900 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the powers under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules may be exercised only in respect of input tax credit reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger on the date of making and serving the impugned blocking order. Applying precedent, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order insofar as it exceeded that scope and directed the Respondents to restore to the Petitioner the blocked input tax credit equivalent to amounts recovered by the Respondents for June, July and August 2025 that are not otherwise set aside. The directive mandates restoration of ledger credit while preserving any recoveries that remain valid.
The HC held that the powers under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules may be exercised only in respect of input tax credit reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger on the date of making and serving the impugned blocking order. Applying precedent, the court quashed and set aside the impugned order insofar as it exceeded that scope and directed the Respondents to restore to the Petitioner the blocked input tax credit equivalent to amounts recovered by the Respondents for June, July and August 2025 that are not otherwise set aside. The directive mandates restoration of ledger credit while preserving any recoveries that remain valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
