Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9341 to 9360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that DRP directions uploaded to the ITBA portal with a DIN on 26.05.2022 constitute receipt by the assessing officer for limitation purposes under section 144C(13). Uploading ipso facto effects service; physical speed-post receipt on 01.06.2022 was inconsequential. Consequently the one-month limitation period expired on 30.06.2022 and the assessment order passed on 01.07.2022 is time-barred and therefore invalid. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that international taxation matters fall outside electronic communication, noting DRP directions were uploaded by the Revenue and electronic service under the e-Assessment Scheme governs computation of limitation. No substantial question of law arises.
The HC held that DRP directions uploaded to the ITBA portal with a DIN on 26.05.2022 constitute receipt by the assessing officer for limitation purposes under section 144C(13). Uploading ipso facto effects service; physical speed-post receipt on 01.06.2022 was inconsequential. Consequently the one-month limitation period expired on 30.06.2022 and the assessment order passed on 01.07.2022 is time-barred and therefore invalid. The court rejected the Revenue's contention that international taxation matters fall outside electronic communication, noting DRP directions were uploaded by the Revenue and electronic service under the e-Assessment Scheme governs computation of limitation. No substantial question of law arises.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
