Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that s.144C(13) is mandatory and the AO was bound to complete assessment in strict conformity with the DRP's directions within one month from the end of the month in which such directions were received. The AO's failure to do so rendered the proceedings in respect of the transfer-pricing addition time-barred; the transfer-pricing adjustment is therefore declared non est. The Respondent is directed to recompute the Applicant's total income for AY 2011-12 excluding the transfer-pricing adjustment and to refund any resultant amount with statutory interest within eight weeks from the date of uploading the order. The AO had no discretion to extend or deviate from the statutory timeline.
The HC held that s.144C(13) is mandatory and the AO was bound to complete assessment in strict conformity with the DRP's directions within one month from the end of the month in which such directions were received. The AO's failure to do so rendered the proceedings in respect of the transfer-pricing addition time-barred; the transfer-pricing adjustment is therefore declared non est. The Respondent is directed to recompute the Applicant's total income for AY 2011-12 excluding the transfer-pricing adjustment and to refund any resultant amount with statutory interest within eight weeks from the date of uploading the order. The AO had no discretion to extend or deviate from the statutory timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.