Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that s.144C(13) is mandatory and the AO was bound to complete assessment in strict conformity with the DRP's directions within one month from the end of the month in which such directions were received. The AO's failure to do so rendered the proceedings in respect of the transfer-pricing addition time-barred; the transfer-pricing adjustment is therefore declared non est. The Respondent is directed to recompute the Applicant's total income for AY 2011-12 excluding the transfer-pricing adjustment and to refund any resultant amount with statutory interest within eight weeks from the date of uploading the order. The AO had no discretion to extend or deviate from the statutory timeline.
The HC held that s.144C(13) is mandatory and the AO was bound to complete assessment in strict conformity with the DRP's directions within one month from the end of the month in which such directions were received. The AO's failure to do so rendered the proceedings in respect of the transfer-pricing addition time-barred; the transfer-pricing adjustment is therefore declared non est. The Respondent is directed to recompute the Applicant's total income for AY 2011-12 excluding the transfer-pricing adjustment and to refund any resultant amount with statutory interest within eight weeks from the date of uploading the order. The AO had no discretion to extend or deviate from the statutory timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.