Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.