Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
