Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
The HC quashed and set aside orders under s.201 for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20, holding them unsustainable because identical issues were earlier quashed for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2016-17 and the AO (TDS) acted without jurisdiction contrary to the Tribunal's decisions; the Revenue's plea of alternate remedy was rejected. The matter is remitted to the AO (TDS) to the stage of issuance of the show-cause notice under s.201 for fresh adjudication after disposal of the pending HC appeal, with all consequential proceedings held infructuous. The Petitioner's undertaking to withdraw statutory appeals before the CIT(A) is accepted, subject to revival if this order is set aside on challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
