Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed enforcement of the foreign arbitral award against the respondents, holding that objections under Section 48 were untenable. The Court found the award did not direct a company "buyback of shares" and rejected attempts to treat surrender of shares as such. Challenges based on the doctrine of election, alleged contravention of Section 16(b) or Sections 10(b)/14(1)(a)/20 of the Specific Relief Act, waiver, improper delegation, non-consideration of material issues, and alleged fraud were dismissed as merits-based re-appraisals improper in enforcement proceedings or as insufficiently pleaded. Transnational issue-estoppel and comity considerations were acknowledged, but did not preclude enforcement; petition dismissed and award declared enforceable under Sections 47-49.
The HC allowed enforcement of the foreign arbitral award against the respondents, holding that objections under Section 48 were untenable. The Court found the award did not direct a company "buyback of shares" and rejected attempts to treat surrender of shares as such. Challenges based on the doctrine of election, alleged contravention of Section 16(b) or Sections 10(b)/14(1)(a)/20 of the Specific Relief Act, waiver, improper delegation, non-consideration of material issues, and alleged fraud were dismissed as merits-based re-appraisals improper in enforcement proceedings or as insufficiently pleaded. Transnational issue-estoppel and comity considerations were acknowledged, but did not preclude enforcement; petition dismissed and award declared enforceable under Sections 47-49.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
