Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned order directing the petitioner to pay alleged deficit stamp duty and penalty, finding the respondent's determination misconceived insofar as renting/leasing of a residential dwelling is exempt from GST under Entry No. 12 of Central Tax Notification No. 12/2017. The court held the petitioner's challenge meritorious, declared the impugned order dated 19.10.2020 void, and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 2,58,700 (comprising deficit stamp duty and penalty) to the petitioner within six weeks. Costs not expressly awarded. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed the impugned order directing the petitioner to pay alleged deficit stamp duty and penalty, finding the respondent's determination misconceived insofar as renting/leasing of a residential dwelling is exempt from GST under Entry No. 12 of Central Tax Notification No. 12/2017. The court held the petitioner's challenge meritorious, declared the impugned order dated 19.10.2020 void, and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 2,58,700 (comprising deficit stamp duty and penalty) to the petitioner within six weeks. Costs not expressly awarded. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
