Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ by permitting the Petitioner, who had already paid the penalty levied under s.74(9) of the respective GST enactments, to challenge the impugned order dated 26.01.2025 before the Appellate Authority under s.107 within thirty days from receipt of this judgment. The Appellate Authority is directed to admit and decide the appeal on merits after hearing the Petitioner, explicitly without raising the bar of limitation by virtue of prior payment. No estoppel arises from payment to preclude appellate adjudication. The writ is disposed of, subject to the foregoing liberty to pursue statutory appeal.
HC dismissed the writ by permitting the Petitioner, who had already paid the penalty levied under s.74(9) of the respective GST enactments, to challenge the impugned order dated 26.01.2025 before the Appellate Authority under s.107 within thirty days from receipt of this judgment. The Appellate Authority is directed to admit and decide the appeal on merits after hearing the Petitioner, explicitly without raising the bar of limitation by virtue of prior payment. No estoppel arises from payment to preclude appellate adjudication. The writ is disposed of, subject to the foregoing liberty to pursue statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
