Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
The AAR concluded that the proposed transfer of the specific construction-unit by the Applicant to the Transferee constitutes a transfer of a business/going concern rather than addressing the undefined concept of "slump sale." The supply, when characterized as a going concern, falls under SAC 997119 and ordinarily attracts GST at 18%, but is exempt under Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rate) (Entry No.2) because it is a transfer of a going concern as a whole/an independent part. No successive transfers undermine exemption eligibility. Contractual performance obligations and surety to the municipal authority remain enforceable and civil/contractual penalties may arise for any post-transfer non-performance.
The AAR concluded that the proposed transfer of the specific construction-unit by the Applicant to the Transferee constitutes a transfer of a business/going concern rather than addressing the undefined concept of "slump sale." The supply, when characterized as a going concern, falls under SAC 997119 and ordinarily attracts GST at 18%, but is exempt under Notification No.12/2017-CT (Rate) (Entry No.2) because it is a transfer of a going concern as a whole/an independent part. No successive transfers undermine exemption eligibility. Contractual performance obligations and surety to the municipal authority remain enforceable and civil/contractual penalties may arise for any post-transfer non-performance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.