Appeal allows marketing payments as deductible business expenses under Sec.37; director pay retained; R&D deductible from certificate date under Sec.3...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
The HC allowed the petitions, quashing and setting aside the Designated Authority's rejection of the petitioner's Form-1 declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024. The Court held that the petitioner, a declarant assessee, had a valid appeal pending before the CIT(Appeals) as on the specified date (22.07.2024) for AY 2014-15, notwithstanding non-condonation of delay, and thus fell within the statutory definition of "appellant." Relying on precedent and the Scheme's FAQs, the HC found the rejection unlawful and directed the Designated Authority to process the declaration under the Scheme in accordance with its terms. The petitions were allowed and disposed of.
The HC allowed the petitions, quashing and setting aside the Designated Authority's rejection of the petitioner's Form-1 declaration under the DTVSV Scheme, 2024. The Court held that the petitioner, a declarant assessee, had a valid appeal pending before the CIT(Appeals) as on the specified date (22.07.2024) for AY 2014-15, notwithstanding non-condonation of delay, and thus fell within the statutory definition of "appellant." Relying on precedent and the Scheme's FAQs, the HC found the rejection unlawful and directed the Designated Authority to process the declaration under the Scheme in accordance with its terms. The petitions were allowed and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
