Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
HC allowed writ petition under Article 226, finding procedural infirmities in the assessment process. The court held that Respondent No.1 failed to consider a supplier's timely reply to the s.133(6) notice and supporting documents, and relied on non-existent judicial precedents when computing peak director-loan balances without disclosing basis or issuing a show cause notice. The HC remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing issuance of a fresh show cause notice specifying proposed additions and disallowances, provision of reasonable time and opportunity to file replies, and mandatory personal hearing before passing the assessment order.
HC allowed writ petition under Article 226, finding procedural infirmities in the assessment process. The court held that Respondent No.1 failed to consider a supplier's timely reply to the s.133(6) notice and supporting documents, and relied on non-existent judicial precedents when computing peak director-loan balances without disclosing basis or issuing a show cause notice. The HC remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing issuance of a fresh show cause notice specifying proposed additions and disallowances, provision of reasonable time and opportunity to file replies, and mandatory personal hearing before passing the assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
