Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee company, holding that additions made under section 153C were unsustainable and directing deletion of the impugned additions (including Rs.25,91,654). The Tribunal found no incriminating material in the search connected to the third person and that admitted commission receipts were those of the controlling individual, not the artificial judicial person; share transfers and attendant commissions were between shareholders and did not constitute assessable income of the company. The satisfaction note was held vague and non-descriptive for lack of year-wise quantification of seized material, rendering initiation under s.153C without force of law; consequential orders under s.153C were quashed.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee company, holding that additions made under section 153C were unsustainable and directing deletion of the impugned additions (including Rs.25,91,654). The Tribunal found no incriminating material in the search connected to the third person and that admitted commission receipts were those of the controlling individual, not the artificial judicial person; share transfers and attendant commissions were between shareholders and did not constitute assessable income of the company. The satisfaction note was held vague and non-descriptive for lack of year-wise quantification of seized material, rendering initiation under s.153C without force of law; consequential orders under s.153C were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.