Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that reassessment proceedings were invalid where the notice dated 19-07-2022 for A.Y. 2016-17 was issued beyond the three-year period without prior sanction from the authority specified under section 151 of the Act. Because the requisite sanction should have been accorded by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General (or, in their absence, Chief Commissioner or Director General), the notice issued with approval only of the Principal Commissioner was vitiated for lack of competent prior approval. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, quashed the reassessment notice and set aside consequential proceedings as without jurisdiction.
ITAT held that reassessment proceedings were invalid where the notice dated 19-07-2022 for A.Y. 2016-17 was issued beyond the three-year period without prior sanction from the authority specified under section 151 of the Act. Because the requisite sanction should have been accorded by the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General (or, in their absence, Chief Commissioner or Director General), the notice issued with approval only of the Principal Commissioner was vitiated for lack of competent prior approval. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, quashed the reassessment notice and set aside consequential proceedings as without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
