Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the assessee, a cooperative credit society (not an RBI-licensed bank), was not obliged to deduct tax at source under s.194A(3)(v) on interest paid to members for A.Y. 2014-15 and therefore could not be treated as an "assessee in default" under s.201(1). The Tribunal further concluded that no interest under s.201(1A) was exigible. Even accepting, arguendo, the lower authorities' treatment of the society as a bank, no statutory duty to effect TDS on members' time deposit interest arose prior to 1 June 2015. Consequently, initiation of penalty proceedings under s.271C was held to be erroneous.
The ITAT held that the assessee, a cooperative credit society (not an RBI-licensed bank), was not obliged to deduct tax at source under s.194A(3)(v) on interest paid to members for A.Y. 2014-15 and therefore could not be treated as an "assessee in default" under s.201(1). The Tribunal further concluded that no interest under s.201(1A) was exigible. Even accepting, arguendo, the lower authorities' treatment of the society as a bank, no statutory duty to effect TDS on members' time deposit interest arose prior to 1 June 2015. Consequently, initiation of penalty proceedings under s.271C was held to be erroneous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.