Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the Section 9 petition under the A&C Act is maintainable as the applicant's crypto assets, held via the WazirX platform and accessible from her ordinary residence in India, were prima facie situated within the Court's jurisdiction and rendered inaccessible by freezing of the platform. The Court found that the platform was operated by entities connected to the respondent and that the applicant's holdings (3,532.20 XRP) were distinct from ERC-20 tokens affected by the cyber-attack. The HC granted interim relief under Section 9, recognizing the applicant's entitlement to protection pending arbitration and/or adjudication of whether the foreign scheme of arrangement binds her, and disposed of the application.
The HC held that the Section 9 petition under the A&C Act is maintainable as the applicant's crypto assets, held via the WazirX platform and accessible from her ordinary residence in India, were prima facie situated within the Court's jurisdiction and rendered inaccessible by freezing of the platform. The Court found that the platform was operated by entities connected to the respondent and that the applicant's holdings (3,532.20 XRP) were distinct from ERC-20 tokens affected by the cyber-attack. The HC granted interim relief under Section 9, recognizing the applicant's entitlement to protection pending arbitration and/or adjudication of whether the foreign scheme of arrangement binds her, and disposed of the application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
