Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned orders, holding that demands for differential export duty, interest, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable. The Tribunal ruled the post-2011 self-assessment regime could not be applied to transactions predating 08-04-2011, and that under the earlier regime it was incumbent on the proper officer to verify, examine, sample and assess export value when the goods were presented. The Department's failure to draw/test samples, seek clarifications or provisionally assess precluded invocation of the extended limitation period. Further, as the Let Export Order issued 09-06-2008, the demand arising from Notification No.79/2008 was inapplicable. Consequently, the redetermination and attendant fiscal and penal consequences were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned orders, holding that demands for differential export duty, interest, confiscation and penalties were unsustainable. The Tribunal ruled the post-2011 self-assessment regime could not be applied to transactions predating 08-04-2011, and that under the earlier regime it was incumbent on the proper officer to verify, examine, sample and assess export value when the goods were presented. The Department's failure to draw/test samples, seek clarifications or provisionally assess precluded invocation of the extended limitation period. Further, as the Let Export Order issued 09-06-2008, the demand arising from Notification No.79/2008 was inapplicable. Consequently, the redetermination and attendant fiscal and penal consequences were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.