Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
The tax authority assigns specific officer designations as proper officers for Sections 74A, 75(2), 122 of the CGST Act and Rule 142(1A), setting hierarchical monetary limits for issuance of show-cause notices and orders (Superintendent, Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Additional/Joint Commissioner) and clarifies aggregation rules where central and integrated tax/penalty demands combine. Procedures for statements after notices, corrigenda when subsequent demands exceed original officer limits, and that the adjudicating officer for matters remitted by appellate fora under Section 75(2) is the original adjudicating authority are prescribed; authorities are directed to publicize the circular and report implementation difficulties.
The tax authority assigns specific officer designations as proper officers for Sections 74A, 75(2), 122 of the CGST Act and Rule 142(1A), setting hierarchical monetary limits for issuance of show-cause notices and orders (Superintendent, Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Additional/Joint Commissioner) and clarifies aggregation rules where central and integrated tax/penalty demands combine. Procedures for statements after notices, corrigenda when subsequent demands exceed original officer limits, and that the adjudicating officer for matters remitted by appellate fora under Section 75(2) is the original adjudicating authority are prescribed; authorities are directed to publicize the circular and report implementation difficulties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
