Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
