Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4789
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 95769 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
HC held that the impugned provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts was valid insofar as the exercising officer is concerned: Notification No. 14/2017 dated 1 July 2017 accords the rank of Principal Commissioner, GST to the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, thereby conferring competence under section 83, CGST Act, 2017 to issue provisional attachments. The Petitioner's challenge to the officer's authority was rejected as unsustainable. The HC nevertheless permitted the Petitioner to file fresh objections to the provisional attachment; upon such filing the authority must communicate its reasons for the attachment to the Petitioner within two weeks. Petition dismissed as disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4789
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
