Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC directed petitioners to appear before investigating officers of the O/o. Director General, GST Intelligence, Raipur on 28 Oct 2025 and thereafter as required for inquiry into alleged fraudulent Input Tax Credit claims based on suspected fake invoices. The court ordered that, subject to petitioners' cooperation in the investigation, the Central GST Authority shall refrain from instituting coercive action against the petitioners in respect of two specified supplier firms. The respondent authorities were directed to adjudicate the objections filed by the petitioners expeditiously by passing a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of.
HC directed petitioners to appear before investigating officers of the O/o. Director General, GST Intelligence, Raipur on 28 Oct 2025 and thereafter as required for inquiry into alleged fraudulent Input Tax Credit claims based on suspected fake invoices. The court ordered that, subject to petitioners' cooperation in the investigation, the Central GST Authority shall refrain from instituting coercive action against the petitioners in respect of two specified supplier firms. The respondent authorities were directed to adjudicate the objections filed by the petitioners expeditiously by passing a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.