Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the rejection of the s.161 application and dismissed the challenge to the orders under s.73 of the respective GST enactments insofar as the impugned order dated 25.02.2025 is found to be a detailed adjudicatory determination not warranting exercise of s.161 remedial jurisdiction. The court held that the s.161 rejection is sustainable. The Respondent is directed to pass a fresh order thereafter, conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the stipulated requirements imposed by the Respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with no further interference in the impugned assessment order absent such compliance.
HC upheld the rejection of the s.161 application and dismissed the challenge to the orders under s.73 of the respective GST enactments insofar as the impugned order dated 25.02.2025 is found to be a detailed adjudicatory determination not warranting exercise of s.161 remedial jurisdiction. The court held that the s.161 rejection is sustainable. The Respondent is directed to pass a fresh order thereafter, conditioned upon the Petitioner's compliance with the stipulated requirements imposed by the Respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, with no further interference in the impugned assessment order absent such compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
