Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that services procured abroad relating to GDR/FCCB issuance constitute "banking and other financial services" and, being received by a recipient located in India for business, were taxable under the reverse charge mechanism; the appellant's contention of non-receipt of services was rejected. The Tribunal also upheld service taxability of receipts for sale of television time as "sale of space or time for advertisement," confirming the impugned demand. However, CESTAT concluded the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, found no suppression, and held the demands barred by the statutory limitation; consequently the tax demands were set aside on limitation grounds and the appeal allowed.
CESTAT held that services procured abroad relating to GDR/FCCB issuance constitute "banking and other financial services" and, being received by a recipient located in India for business, were taxable under the reverse charge mechanism; the appellant's contention of non-receipt of services was rejected. The Tribunal also upheld service taxability of receipts for sale of television time as "sale of space or time for advertisement," confirming the impugned demand. However, CESTAT concluded the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, found no suppression, and held the demands barred by the statutory limitation; consequently the tax demands were set aside on limitation grounds and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
