Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the challenge and set aside the order denying exemption under s.11/12 and the rejection of the s.119(2)(b) condonation application. The petitioner had filed the ITR within time but uploaded Form-10B with a 16-day delay due to an auditor/tax-professional error; the assessment under s.143(1) and subsequent rectification under s.154 had disallowed the exemption and created demand. The HC held that the matter warranted equitable, judicious exercise of discretion rather than automatic forfeiture for a bona fide procedural lapse. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's s.119(2)(b) application afresh and pass a reasoned order.
The HC allowed the challenge and set aside the order denying exemption under s.11/12 and the rejection of the s.119(2)(b) condonation application. The petitioner had filed the ITR within time but uploaded Form-10B with a 16-day delay due to an auditor/tax-professional error; the assessment under s.143(1) and subsequent rectification under s.154 had disallowed the exemption and created demand. The HC held that the matter warranted equitable, judicious exercise of discretion rather than automatic forfeiture for a bona fide procedural lapse. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's s.119(2)(b) application afresh and pass a reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.