Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the challenge and set aside the order denying exemption under s.11/12 and the rejection of the s.119(2)(b) condonation application. The petitioner had filed the ITR within time but uploaded Form-10B with a 16-day delay due to an auditor/tax-professional error; the assessment under s.143(1) and subsequent rectification under s.154 had disallowed the exemption and created demand. The HC held that the matter warranted equitable, judicious exercise of discretion rather than automatic forfeiture for a bona fide procedural lapse. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's s.119(2)(b) application afresh and pass a reasoned order.
The HC allowed the challenge and set aside the order denying exemption under s.11/12 and the rejection of the s.119(2)(b) condonation application. The petitioner had filed the ITR within time but uploaded Form-10B with a 16-day delay due to an auditor/tax-professional error; the assessment under s.143(1) and subsequent rectification under s.154 had disallowed the exemption and created demand. The HC held that the matter warranted equitable, judicious exercise of discretion rather than automatic forfeiture for a bona fide procedural lapse. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's s.119(2)(b) application afresh and pass a reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.