Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that denial of exemption u/s 11 on account of delayed filing or non-simultaneous uploading of the audit report in Form No.10B is impermissible where substantive statutory conditions for exemption are satisfied. The Tribunal determined the requirement to file Form No.10B with the return is procedural/directory, not mandatory, and technical discrepancies (including an incorrect entry of section 10(23C)(iv) instead of section 11) cannot defeat the assessee's substantive right to exemption. Consequently, the CPC and JCIT(A)'s actions assessing gross receipts as taxable income were set aside and the exemption u/s 11 was restored.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that denial of exemption u/s 11 on account of delayed filing or non-simultaneous uploading of the audit report in Form No.10B is impermissible where substantive statutory conditions for exemption are satisfied. The Tribunal determined the requirement to file Form No.10B with the return is procedural/directory, not mandatory, and technical discrepancies (including an incorrect entry of section 10(23C)(iv) instead of section 11) cannot defeat the assessee's substantive right to exemption. Consequently, the CPC and JCIT(A)'s actions assessing gross receipts as taxable income were set aside and the exemption u/s 11 was restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.